Benutzer:Rdiez/BrittleOperatingSystems: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus /dev/tal
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{BenutzerSeitenNichtVeraendernWarnung|rdiez}} = Brittle Operating Systems = It's hard to believe how brittle modern Operating Systems still are. After years of…“)
 
Zeile 3: Zeile 3:
 
= Brittle Operating Systems =
 
= Brittle Operating Systems =
  
It's hard to believe how brittle modern Operating Systems still are. After years of development and refinement, you would expect most mainstream OSes to have reached a reasonable level of robustness and security. However, a simple fork bomb easily brings most OSes down.
+
It's hard to believe how brittle modern Operating Systems still are. After years of development and refinement, you would expect most mainstream OSes to have reached a reasonable level of robustness and security. However, a simple [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fork_bomb fork bomb] easily brings most OSes down.
  
It is as if the concept of denial of service would not belong in the software security category. Apparently, responsiveness does not fit in the OS writers' idea of software robustness either.
+
It is as if the concept of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial-of-service_attack denial of service] would not belong in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_security software security] category. Apparently, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsiveness responsiveness] does not fit into the OS writers' idea of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robustness_%28computer_science%29 software robustness] either.

Version vom 13. Dezember 2013, 20:52 Uhr

Warning sign
Dies sind die persönlichen Benutzerseiten von rdiez, bitte nicht verändern! Ausnahmen sind nur einfache Sprachkorrekturen wie Tippfehler, falsche Präpositionen oder Ähnliches. Alles andere bitte nur dem Benutzer melden!


Brittle Operating Systems

It's hard to believe how brittle modern Operating Systems still are. After years of development and refinement, you would expect most mainstream OSes to have reached a reasonable level of robustness and security. However, a simple fork bomb easily brings most OSes down.

It is as if the concept of denial of service would not belong in the software security category. Apparently, responsiveness does not fit into the OS writers' idea of software robustness either.